Brian Babin addresses Medicaid policy and fiscal responsibility on social media

Brian Babin addresses Medicaid policy and fiscal responsibility on social media
Brian Babin, U.S. Representative for Texas from District 36 — Wikipedia
0Comments

Brian Babin, a U.S. Congressman representing Texas’ 36th district since 2015, has been vocal on social media regarding various political issues. Babin, who succeeded Steve Stockman in Congress and holds a degree from Lamar University, often shares his perspectives with his followers.

On June 4, 2025, Babin criticized the current state of Medicaid policy in the United States. He stated that “Over 4.8 million able-bodied adults on Medicaid are refusing to work, and Democrats are rewarding them for it. This isn’t compassion, it’s enablement.” He emphasized that “The American Dream isn’t a giveaway, it’s earned.

Later that day, Babin praised a new legislative bill for its fiscal responsibility. He described it as “the most fiscally responsible in history—$1.4T in deficit reduction, $1.7T in savings.

On June 5, 2025, Babin shared an invitation to his audience to “Tune in!” though further details were not provided within the tweet.



Related

Dade Phelan, Texas State Representative of 21st district

Dade Phelan shares Reagan quote and local reflections on social media

Dade Phelan, Republican representative for Texas’s 21st House district, posted several tweets on April 30, 2026.

Brian Babin, Chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

House committee passes National Quantum Initiative Reauthorization Act on April 29

The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology has passed bipartisan legislation aimed at boosting U.S. leadership in quantum research through H.R. 8462. The act includes provisions for workforce development and increased agency collaboration.

Brian Babin, Chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

House Science Committee leaders seek information on NASEM Attribution Committee policies

Leaders from the House Science Committee have requested detailed information from NASEM about its Attribution Committee amid concerns over potential conflicts of interest. The lawmakers highlighted transparency issues related to committee member affiliations with advocacy groups.